Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,031
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Shatila Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00850
Defendant: Hicham Salloum, Shatila Restaurant, Inc. doing business as Shatila Restaurant doing business as Shatila Lebanese Grill and Hookah doing business as Shatila Restaurant Lebanese Grill & Hookah doing business as Shatila Lebanese Grill and Hookah Lounge doing business a, Sean Salloum and others
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. and Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Not Classified By Court: ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 60 Pension Trust v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01470
Plaintiff: Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 60 Pension Trust
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg, David Wehner and others
Petitioner: Frederic Lou, Charles Tebele, Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. and others
Ford v. Glutality Provider Group, P.A.
as 3:2023cv05082
Plaintiff: Jaime Ford
Defendant: Glutality Provider Group, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC v. United Health Group,Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00131
Counter Claimant: Siemens Corporation Group Insurance and Flexible Benefits Program, Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. Welfare Plan and others
Defendant: AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Partners' Welfare Benefits Plan, Apple Inc. Health and Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Plaintiff: Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC dba 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory and Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC doing business as 24 Hour COVIDRT-PCR Laboratory
Cross Defendant: OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc. and UHG, Inc, Group Benefits Plan
Cross Claimant: Envision Healthcare Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Counter Defendant: Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PJM Power Providers Group v. FERC
as 23-2612
Petitioner: PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP
Intervenor: VISTRA CORP
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Burbige et al v. ATI Physical Therapy, Inc. f/k/a Fortress Value Acquisition Corp. II et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv04349
Plaintiff: Kevin Burbige, Ziyang Nie and Melbourne Firefighters' Retirement System
Defendant: ATI Physical Therapy, Inc. f/k/a Fortress Value Acquisition Corp. II, Labeed Diab, Joseph Jordan and others
Petitioner: Phillip Goldstein, The Freedom and Justice Foundation, David Turk and others
INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE ACCOUNT STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY ONE PROVIDER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATIONS OF 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) & 933
as 1:2023sc01882
In Re: INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE ACCOUNT STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY ONE PROVIDER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATIONS OF 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) & 933
Interested Party: USA
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03298
Plaintiff: Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant: Actavis Holdco US, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re the Allstate Corporation Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv10510
Defendant: The Allstate Corporation, Thomas J. Wilson, Matthew E. Winter and others
Plaintiff: City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System and City of Providence
Petitioner: Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California, City of Fort Lauderdale General Employees' Retirement System, Carpenters Annuity Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Robert Kadrovach v. Anonymous Health Care Provider, et al
as 23-2563
Petitioner: ROBERT KADROVACH
Respondent: ANONYMOUS HEALTH CARE PROVIDER, NOE J. MARANDET, Doctor and CAROL KUENZLI, Doctor

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?