Cases 41 - 50 of 53
LEFRANCOIS v. MABUS
as 1:2010cv01968
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH P. LEFRANCOIS
Defendant:
RAY MABUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Mannion v. Shinseki et al
as 1:2010cv00886
Plaintiff:
Paul Francis Mannion
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki, Ray Mabus and W. Dean Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MABUS et al
as 1:2010cv01861
Plaintiff:
WALTER J. JACKSON, JR.
Defendant:
RAY MABUS and CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
HAVENS v. MABUS
as 1:2010cv01859
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HAVENS
Defendant:
RAY MABUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MCDONOUGH v. MABUS
as 1:2010cv01428
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. MCDONOUGH
Defendant:
RAY MABUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Harris v. Mabus
as 1:2010cv00833
Plaintiff:
John C. Harris
Defendant:
Ray Mabus
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
USS FORREST SHERMAN DD-931 FOUNDATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2010cv02174
Plaintiff:
USS FORREST SHERMAN DD-931 FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, RAY MABUS and THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 470 (f) National Historic Preservation Act
Porter v. Secretary of Navy
as 1:2003cv06291
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Porter
Defendant:
B.J. Penn and Ray Mabus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
LUDLOW v. MABUS
as 1:2010cv00236
Plaintiff:
BARTLETT D. LUDLOW
Defendant:
RAY MABUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. United States Department of the Navy et al
as 2:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife, Defenders of Wildlife, The Humane Society of the United States and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Navy, Ray Mabus, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
