Cases 41 - 50 of 485
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, Brady, 16 Major Cities and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11071
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, Brady, State of New Jersey and others
Regan v. United States of America et al
as 7:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Marine Corps Installations East-Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Department of the Navy and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, ex rel., Michael S. Regan, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality and Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Braidwood Management Inc. et al. v. Xavier Becerra et al.
as 4:2020cv00283
Plaintiff:
John Kelley, Kelley Orthodontics, Joel Starnes and others
Defendant:
Steven T. Mnuchin, Alex M. Azar II, Eugene Scalia and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Illinois, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Davidson v. State of North Carolina
as 3:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Chris Ryan Davidson
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16096
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16095
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
