Cases 41 - 50 of 61
In re: Luis Satizabal
as 13-12912
Petitioner:
In re: LUIS ALBERTO SATIZABAL
Successive Habeas Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Lott v. The District Court of Southern District of Ohio et al
as 2:2013cv00562
Plaintiff:
Harry William Lott
Defendant:
The District Court of Southern District of Ohio, Judge Frost, U.S. Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
In re: Gregory Harri
as 13-12077
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY HARRIS
Mandamus Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Laurack Bray v. USDC-CALA
as 12-72501
:
In re: LAURACK D. BRAY
Petitioner:
LAURACK D. BRAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and others
Adams Jones Law Firm, P.A.
as 4:2012mc09014
Movant:
Adams Jones Law Firm, P.A.
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
JORDAN v. U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
as 1:2012cv00838
Plaintiff:
CONSUELO JORDAN
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CALDWELL v. KAGAN et al
as 1:2011cv02100
Plaintiff:
KEITH R. CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
ELENA KAGAN, ERIC HOLDER, DOUGLAS HOWARD GINSBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Attorney's Office
as 1:2011mc22868
Plaintiff:
U.S. Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Diettel v. Defense Logistics Agency et al
as 4:2011cv01370
Plaintiff:
Michael Diettel
Defendant:
Defense Logistics Agency, James Washington, Bernard Solovey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE v. COWARD
as 1:2010mc00179
Petitioner:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Respondent:
RICH COWARD
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
