Cases 41 - 50 of 4,731
Scott v. Lavender Lingerie et al
as 1:2023cv04731
Plaintiff:
Kimberly R. Scott
Defendant:
Lavender Lingerie doing business as Savage X Fenty, Shoe Carnival, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe Global, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Alfred McZeal v. Redwood Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv08540
Plaintiff:
Alfred McZeal, Jr
Defendant:
Redwood Holdings, LLC, Manual Rodriguez, Does 1 through 10 and others
Petitioner:
DOES 1 through X, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nano-X Imaging Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv08611
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Nano-X Imaging Ltd. and Ran Poliakine
Keeley v. Town of Ramapo et al
as 7:2023cv08353
Plaintiff:
JOHN KEELEY
Defendant:
TOWN OF RAMAPO, TOWN OF RAMAPO PLANNING BOARD, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
HateAid gGmbH et al
as 4:2023mc80235
Petitioner:
HateAid gGmbH, Ballon Josephine and Grinberg Avital
Respondent:
Twitter International Unlimited Company (TIUC) and X CORP.
Mendenhall v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11025
Plaintiff:
Larry Mendenhall
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and Does I through X
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
US v. David Allen, Jr.
as 23-4570
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID ALLEN, JR., a/k/a David J. Allen, Jr., a/k/a Yamah Qiyamah Bey, a/k/a Kranston X
X Corp. v. Bonta
as 2:2023cv01939
Plaintiff:
X Corp.
Defendant:
Robert A Bonta and Robert A. Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
