Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Dunn
as 12-3566
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Britney Hall
Defendant - Appellant:
William James Dunn
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
THOMPSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00103
Plaintiff:
GWEN THOMPSON , K.M. , BETTY WYATT and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
USA v. Britney Barne
as 11-11971
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRITNEY LAFAYE BARNES
Bernard Madoff, et al v. Britney Spears, et al
as 10-2149
Plaintiff:
BERNARD L. MADOFF, aka Gino Romano, Inc., dba Jonathan Lee Riches
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
BRITNEY SPEARS, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and KEVIN FEDERLINE
Bernard Madoff, et al v. Britney Spears, et al
as 10-2149
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN FEDERLINE, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and BRITNEY SPEARS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff:
BERNARD L. MADOFF, aka Gino Romano, Inc., dba Jonathan Lee Riches
Mayhew v. Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., Inc, et al
as 10-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS MAYHEW
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERRY CREEK MORTGAGE CO., INC., et al., JENNIFER ROGERS, NORA ZIEL and others
Mayhew v. Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., Inc, et al
as 10-1150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS MAYHEW
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER ROGERS, CHERRY CREEK MORTGAGE CO., INC., et al., NORA ZIEL and others
Britney Grant v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2009cv07323
Plaintiff:
Britney Grant
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
