Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 256
Chakrabarti et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00399
Plaintiff: Atreyi Chakrabarti, Mohan ABBURU, Majid ABDUL and others
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Orso v. Cai We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021mc00130
Plaintiff: Matthew E. Orso
Defendant: Qianshun Cai
Interested Party: Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
Orso v. Cai We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021mc00121
Plaintiff: Matthew E. Orso
Defendant: Qianshun Cai
Interested Party: Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Zhang v. Garland
as 21-6480
Petitioner: ZHENG CAI ZHANG
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
DAVYDOV v. CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03755
Plaintiff: ROBERT DAVYDOV
Defendant: CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC., TIMOTHY B PAGE, KATHRYN G JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Kent v. CAI International, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01199
Plaintiff: Michael Kent
Defendant: CAI International, Inc., Kathryn G. Jackson, Andrew S. Ogawa and others
Jones v. CAI International, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01200
Plaintiff: Brian Jones
Defendant: CAI International, Inc., Kathryn G. Jackson, Andrew S. Ogawa and others
CICCOTELLI v. CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03708
Plaintiff: ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant: CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC., TIMOTHY B PAGE, KATHRYN G JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Hoag v. CAI International Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06977
Plaintiff: Patrick Hoag
Defendant: CAI International Inc., Timothy Page, Kathryn Jackson and others
Coffman v. CAI International, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv06376
Plaintiff: Catherine Coffman
Defendant: CAI International, Inc., Kathryn G. Jackson, Andrew S. Ogawa and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?