Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Alexsam, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores LP et al
as 1:2012mi00176
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc.
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores LP, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble Marketing Services Corp. and others
Alexsam, Inc v. BEST BUY STORES LP et al
as 3:2012mc80230
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc
Defendant:
BEST BUY STORES LP, Barnes & Noble Inc., Barnes & Noble Marketing Services Corp. and others
3rd_party_defendant:
Blackhawk Network, Inc.
Alexsam, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores LP et al
as 3:2012mc00155
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc.
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores LP, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble Marketing Services Corp. and others
Objector:
Bank of America
Alexsam, Inc v. Best Buy Stores, LP et al
as 1:2012cv02499
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores, LP, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble Marketing Services Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dd Fed. Question: Discovery Disputes
Kardashian et al v. The Gap Inc et al
as 2:2011cv06568
Plaintiff:
Kim Kardashian and KimsAPrincess Inc
Defendant:
The Gap Inc, Old Navy LLC, Old Navy Apparel LLC and others
Intervenor:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Kim Kardashian v. The Gap Inc et al
as 2:2011cv05960
Defendant:
Does, Gap Apparel LLC, Old Navy Apparel LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Kardashian
Lerner v. Gap Inc., The
as 3:2009cv04897
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lerner and Danielle Lerner
Defendant:
Gap Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joel Ruiz v. Gap, Inc., et al
as 09-15971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL RUIZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
GAP, INC. and VANGENT, INC.
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RETAIL INDUSTRY LEADERS ASSOCIATION
Susan Yoon v. The Gap, Inc.
as 09-55056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSAN YOON, an individual on behalf of herself and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GAP, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
