Cases 51 - 60 of 891
Horton v. Texas Federation for Children PAC Inc
as 3:2022cv02736
Plaintiff:
Lucas B Horton
Defendant:
Texas Federation for Children PAC Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
In Re: ROI Network, LLC
as 3:2022mc00093
Respondent:
ROI Network, LLC doing business as Auto Defender and ROI Network, LLC a Connecticut limited liability company doing business as Auto Defender
Petitioner:
Kurt Morales, II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Horton v. Garland
as 22-6193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN D. HORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Horton v. Rank Media USA LLC
as 3:2022cv02476
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Rank Media USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Horton v. 360 Digital Media LLC
as 3:2022cv02475
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
360 Digital Media LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
USA v. Christopher Horton
as 22-5980
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HORTON
Horton v. Advantage One Brokers Corp
as 3:2022cv02474
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Advantage One Brokers Corp
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alex et al v. NFL Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv09239
Plaintiff:
Jim Alex, Mark Bowers, Boyce Brown and others
Defendant:
NFL Enterprises, LLC and National Football League
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
United States of America v. Smith
as 22-2823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Reddell Smith, AKA Renny
Defendant:
Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany and others
Horton v. Garland
as 5:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
