Cases 51 - 60 of 286
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-13680
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Poole et al v. Bendixen et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2020cv00697
Defendant:
Thomas Oelrichs, Jeff Raney, Randy Mooney and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 7, Charles C. Manner, John Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
James Young, Sr., et al v. Township of Scott, et al
as 20-2349
Defendant:
JARED NOSS, JEREMY MOYER, WILLIAM RICHENDRFER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA E. YOUNG and JAMES M. YOUNG, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND KLINGLER, MEGAN FETTERMAN, VINCENT FIGUERIDO and others
Saul Pelayo v. M. Smith, et al
as 20-16155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAUL PELAYO
Defendant:
D. MOYER, Prison Guard Employed with the CDCR, in His Individual and Official Capacities, J BOJORQUEZ, Prison Lieutenant Employed with the CDCR, in His Individual & Official Capacities, B. GREER, Prison Lieutenant Employed wiht the CDCR, in His Individual & Official Capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee:
I. SMITH, Prison Guard Employed with the CDCR, in His Individual and Official Capacities
Edwin Escobar-Salmeron v. Stephen Moyer
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-6853
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN T. MOYER, CO II DANIEL ARNDT and COREY T. HOLLAND
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWIN BLADIMIR ESCOBAR-SALMERON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.