Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,597
ADT LLC et al v. Skyline Security Management, Inc. et al
as 9:2024cv80215
Plaintiff: ADT LLC and The ADT Security Corporation
Defendant: Skyline Security Management, Inc., Edwin Arroyave, Matthew Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
United States of America v. Ramos
as 24-785
Defendant: GENARO RAMOS and Bandit
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Ramos
as 24-40080
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Deibi Ramos
Caraffa v. Unknown Leon, et al.
as 24-681
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee: UNKNOWN LEON, c/o mail/property officer at Rincon, UNKNOWN RAMOS, housing unit 5 correctional officer, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as unknown unlawful employees of ASPC- Tucson and others
United States of America v. Ramos
as 24-293
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ORTEXIS RAMOS
RAMOS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00161
Petitioner: DESTINY RAMOS
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Jose Ramos-Cruz, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1104
Petitioner: JOSE MANUEL RAMOS-CRUZ, BIANA AMERICA GIRON-BARRERA DE RAMOS, A. C. R.-G. and others
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Melchor-Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-223
Petitioner: ROFINO MELCHOR-RAMOS, LISSETH SOTO-CUYAMANI, SCARLETT MELCHOR-SOTO and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos-Velez v. McDonough
as 24-1348
Claimant: ERNESTO RAMOS-VELEZ
Respondent / Appellee: DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?