Cases 51 - 60 of 6,055
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Lima
as 4:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Roger Blaise Lima doing business as El Faro Sports Bar, Roger Blaise Lima individually doing business as El Faro Sports Bar also known as Roger Blaise Lima and Roger Blaise Lima
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Richards v. Centripetal Networks, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Albert Richards
Defendant:
Centripetal Networks, Inc., Alsop Louie Partners LLC, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Stewart et al v. Ladd et al
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jody Virginia Lynn Stewart, Delores Lee Robinette Reynolds and William Joseph Robinette, Sr.
Defendant:
Richard E. Ladd, Jr., Karissa H Range, Penn Stuart & Eskridge, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Brady Rogers
as 24-1302
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brady Austin Rogers
Rogers v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-805
Petitioner:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, KEATON RILEY, Chief of State to Patrick Kennedy, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff and others
Rogers v. County of Sacramento, et al.
as 24-738
Plaintiff:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, KEATON RILEY, Chief of State to Patrick Kennedy, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff and others
Rogers v. Sacramento County, et al.
as 24-559
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Board of Supervisors, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, City Clerk, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
