Cases 51 - 60 of 4,628
Walker v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1806
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL WALKER, as Guardian of an incapacitated adult on behalf of Issac Contreras
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, AARON BOWEN, UNKNOWN BOWEN, husband and wife and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WALKER v. 2100 2ND ST SW, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
ANGELICA WALKER
Defendant:
2100 2nd ST SW, LLC and Thomas Wilbur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WALKER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00238
Petitioner:
YOLANDA WALKER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carr v. Walker et al
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
David Aaron Carr
Defendant:
Suzanne Walker, Martin Placke, Frank Malinak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Walker Specialty Construction, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust for Southern Nevada, et al.
as 24-1560
Plaintiff:
WALKER SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS JOINT PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN NEVADA and THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN NEVADA
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust, et al.
as 24-1538
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
WALKER JOHN & DEBRA TRUST, BERHAN AHMEN, PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 8 L L C and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
