Cases 61 - 70 of 98
M.A. v. Indiana University Health
as 1:2018cv07267
Plaintiff:
M.A., an infant by his Father and natural guardian JEFFREY ASHEAR and M.A.
Defendant:
Indiana University Health
United States of America v. Kinyon (Antonmarchi)
as 18-2118
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Malcom Kinyon, AKA Angel Rafael Rios-Zayas, AKA Sean Williams, AKA "M.A.", Star Bermudez, Brian Bowman, AKA Pony and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Eric Antonmarchi, AKA Powerful, AKA "P"
Shah, M.D. M.A. v. Baptist Health System, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00751
Defendant:
Graham Reeve, William Waechter, Baptist Health System, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jaydeep Shah, M.D. M.A.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 5101
In re: Robert M.A. Nadeau
as 1:2018adr00008
Other:
American Bar Association, US Bankruptcy Court - NH, Clerk and US Court of Appeals-First Circuit, Clerk
Respondent:
Robert M.A. Nadeau
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Tina Hayden v. M.A., INC. et al
as 8:2018cv00592
Defendant:
Does and M.A., INC.
Plaintiff:
Tina Hayden
M.A. v. St. Vincent Hospital
as 1:2018cv00225
Plaintiff:
M.A.
Defendant:
St. Vincent Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
M.A. v. Explore Talent
as 1:2018cv00221
Defendant:
Explore Talent
Plaintiff:
M.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
M.A. et al v. NRA Group, LLC
as 1:2017cv07483
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ashear and M.A.
Defendant:
NRA Group, LLC and NRA Group, LLC doing business as National Recovery Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AHMAD v. ZAHRAN et al
as 1:2017cv02705
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD AHMAD and ZUHAIR M.A. ZAHRAN
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91392
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Robert M.A. Nadeau
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
