Cases 61 - 70 of 2,145
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 2:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Barbat v. Sharp Healthcare
as 3:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Edward Barbat
Defendant:
Sharp Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ridall et al
as 1:2023cv20200
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jack C. Ridall, Guss Capital, LLC and Shannon A. Sharp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
USA v. Ortaz Sharp
as 22-14338
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ORTAZ SHARP
United States v. Robert Sharp
as 22-3501
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Carl Sharp
Trilipid Research Institute LLC v. Sharp
as 2:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Trilipid Research Institute LLC
Defendant:
Kevin Sharp
USA v. Isaac Sharpe
as 22-13831
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ISAAC JACKIE SHARPE
Jane Doe v. USDC-ORPIn re: Jane Doe v. USDC-ORP
as 22-70230
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JANE DOE, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Petitioner:
JANE DOE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control v. The United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv03445
Defendant:
Alpha Assembly Solutions, Inc., Ashland Inc., INEOS US Chemicals Company and others
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 Hazardous Substances Releases, Liability - Definition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
