Cases 61 - 70 of 443
Whitford v. US
as 21-1394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THORNWOOD FUND, DENISE GRANDPRE, JOANA C. ANDERSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Lin et al v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2020cv10423
Defendant:
Gregory A. Richardson, Director Kenneth Cuccinelli, Christopher A. Wray and others
Plaintiff:
Sausing Lin and Ying Lin
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Tangtiwatanapaibul v. Tom & Toon Inc
as 20-3852
Defendant:
David J. Louie, Peter Fong Chiu, Douglas Kai Wing Chiu and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Wai Ying Lau, Toon Thai Inc, DBA Noodle Den, Roongkant Preechatammarach, AKA Toon Lau and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Srisuwan Tangtiwatanapaibul, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, AKA Anne Tangtiwatanapaibul, Phouviengkhone Thammavong, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Phouviengsone Sysouvong, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Tukta Phouviengsone and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Beltran
Kao Saephanh v. USA
as 20-35858
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
KAO YING SAEPHANH
Yang et al v. Ardizzone et al
as 6:2020cv06691
Defendant:
Mercedes Ramirez Fernandez, Jamal J. Rossi, Sarah C. Mangelsdorf and others
Plaintiff:
Siyu Yang, Ying Zhu and Lu Yang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yang et al v. Ardizzone et al
as 1:2020cv04139
Defendant:
Mercedes Ramirez Fernandez, Jamal J. Rossi, Sarah C. Mangelsdorf and others
Plaintiff:
Siyu Yang, Ying Zhu and Lu Yang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kim Wong v. William Barr
as 20-71994
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
KIM YING WONG
Paul Williams, et al v. Ying Zhou, et al
as 20-2363
Defendant / Appellee:
JIHAHAO INTERNATIONAL GROUP LTD, YING ZHOU and GUOLIANG TIAN, AKA Tony Tian
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL F. WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAKSWILL GROUP CORP
Cheng v. Barr
as 20-1794
Petitioner:
Ying Cheng
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
