Cases 61 - 70 of 927
Abramson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00833
Plaintiff:
Abramson, Lisa Brown, Louis Abramson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Ables et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00758
Plaintiff:
Ables, Steven Ables, Zechariah Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Mickles v. Mainzer Volksbanke G, Germany et al
as 1:2022cv21030
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Mainzer Volksbanke G, Germany, Certified Public Accountants of America, International Development Bank (South America) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Clervrain et al v. Peters et al
as 4:2022cv10743
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir, Biglauwick Plaisimond and others
Defendant:
Gary Peters, Debbie Stabenow, Andy Levin and others
Griffin v. American Zurich
as 22-10304
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Trent S. Griffin, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
American Zurich Insurance Company, Walgreens Company, Greg Wasson, Chief Executive Officer and others
Appellee:
Ryann Brannan and Ken Paxton
Sierra et al v. Trafigura Trading, LLC
as 1:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Richard Sierra, Veronica Gooch, Ronald Sierra and others
Defendant:
Trafigura Trading, LLC and Trafigura Group Pte. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gerald Bush v. Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority, et alIn re: Gerald Bush v. Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority, et al
as 22-1383
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD BUSH
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHRISTI M. JACKSON, ROBERT LABRUM and others
Tina Michelle Espinosa De Los Monteros v. Hilary Clinton et al
as 2:2022cv01554
Plaintiff:
Tina Michelle Espinosa De Los Monteros
Defendant:
Hilary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Regan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
