Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Cassius Medlock v. Calvin Johnson, Warden
as 19-30474
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX POLLOCK
Petitioner / Appellant:
CASSIUS L. MEDLOCK
Marshall Williams v. Calvin Johnson, Warden
as 19-30371
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX POLLOCK
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Andre Harris v. Calvin Johnson, Warden, et al
as 19-30360
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX POLLOCK and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDRE HARRIS
Bentley Jenkins v. Calvin Johnson
as 19-10516
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENTLEY MARK JENKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
James Fowler-Bey v. Calvin Johnson
as 19-6241
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, a/k/a C. Johnson
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES HENRY FOWLER-BEY
Johnson v. Scott
as 19-1020
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT, Captain
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN JOHNSON, JR.
Max Butler v. S. Porter, et al
as 19-30029
Defendant / Appellee:
S. PORTER, C. ROBINSON, CHRISTOPHER GORE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAX RAY BUTLER
Eric Jackson v. Calvin Johnson
as 19-30023
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC L. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, Warden, United States Penitentiary Pollock
Letsie Bass v. Laurence Alexander, et al
as 16-4261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Letsie Bass
Defendant:
University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff
Defendant - Appellee:
Laurence B. Alexander, In His Capacity as Chancellor, UAPB (originally named as Calvin Johnson), Elbert Bennett, in His Capacity as Director of Student Affairs, UAPB and University of Arkansas System, Through its Board of Trustees, Donald R. Bobbitt, President
USA v. Calvin Johnson
as 16-10147
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CALVIN JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
