Cases 61 - 70 of 1,774
USA v. Neil Thomas
as 23-1783
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NEIL THOMAS
MURRAY v. EMMEL et al
as 1:2023cv02511
Plaintiff:
Neil Murray
Defendant:
ALISSA L. EMMEL, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and UR M. JADDOU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Delgado v. McDowell
as 23-1964
Petitioner / Appellant:
EZEKIEL ISIAH DELGADO
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL
Bryan v. Kim et al
as 1:2023cv07445
Plaintiff:
Aimee Bryan
Defendant:
Bom Suk Kim, Neil Mehta, Benjamin Sun and others
Nominal Defendant:
Coupang, Inc.
McGowan v. NetApp, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv04291
Plaintiff:
Neil McGowan
Defendant:
NetApp, Inc., Henri Richard, Elizabeth O'Callahan and others
Hind et al v. FxWinning Limited et al
as 1:2023cv23139
Plaintiff:
Kristoffer Jon Hind, Jason Thomas Waiton, Christopher Campbell and others
Defendant:
FxWinning Limited, CFT Solutions, LLC, Renan de Rocha Gomes Bastos and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Tang v. Kim et al
as 1:2023cv07239
Plaintiff:
Kia Tang
Defendant:
Bom Suk Kim, Gaurav Anand, Neil Mehta and others
Nominal Defendant:
Coupang, Inc.
SCHEINER v. GOETTLER et al
as 2:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
JACOB SCHEINER
Defendant:
MICHAEL GOETTLER, W. DON CORNWELL, ROBERT J. COURY and others
IN RE TELADOC HEALTH, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 23-1112
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Schneider, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and Walter De Schutter
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hui Ma
Petitioner / Appellant:
Leadersel Innotech ESG
Defendant / Appellee:
Teladoc Health, Inc., Jason Gorevic, Mala Murthy and others
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Villasenin, Wesley R. Ledbetter, Chun Mu Hsueh and others
Meenaxi EnterpriseIn re: Meenaxi Enterprise
as 23-2399
Petitioner:
In re: MEENAXI ENTERPRISE
Respondent:
SINGH TRADING CO INC, DBA Roshni Foods, PARDEEP SINGH ANEJ, VDYAS LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
