Cases 61 - 70 of 365
State of Texas, et al v. NHTSA, et al
as 22-1144
Petitioner:
State of Texas, State of Arkansas, State of Indiana and others
Respondent:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Steven Cliff, in his offical capacity as Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, United States Department of Transportation and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 22-40367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arizona, State of Alabama, State of Florida and others
State of Texas v. Yellen
as 22-10560
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Mississippi and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
Janet Yellen, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, Richard K. Delmar, in his official capacity as Acting Inspector General of the Department of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Taxpayers Union Foundation, Buckeye Institute, New Civil Liberties Alliance and others
State of LA v. Centers for Disease
as 22-30303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Innovation Law Lab
Paul Eknes-Tucker, et al v. Governor of the State of Alabama, et al
as 22-11707
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. EKNES-TUCKER, BRIANNA BOE, JAMES ZOE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR CULLMAN COUNTY and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAURA BECKER, BILLY BURLEIGH, HELENA KERSCHNER and others
Not Classified By Court:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION and ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U S Dept of Justice, David Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Boe et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner:
Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Louisiana et al v.Centers for Disease Control & Prevention et al
as 6:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, U S Dept of Health & Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Jodey C Arrington, Brian Babin, Jim Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Florida et al v. Walensky et al
as 8:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
ROCHELLE P WALENSKY, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, SHERRI A BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
