Cases 61 - 70 of 22,639
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Consensys Software Inc. v. Gensler et al
as 4:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Consensys Software Inc.
Defendant:
Gary Gensler, Caroline A. Crenshaw, Jaime E. Lizarraga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Amigo Shuttle Inc. v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
as 24-1087
Plaintiff:
AMIGO SHUTTLE INC. and MICHAEL H. CONNERY, JR.
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, KEW T FLYER INC., CHRISTINA CONTUMELIO and others
Tudor DuPont, et al. v. Sterling Family Trust, et al.
as 24-2636
Plaintiff:
AL TUDOR DUPONT and AURELIA ANDERSON
Defendant:
STERLING FAMILY TRUST, ROCHELLE H. STERLING, individually and as sole Trustee of Sterling Family Trust, and as Manager of Beverly Hills Properties LLC, DOES, 1-20, inclusive and others
Graham, et al v. United States
as 24-1164
Plaintiff:
RICKY T. GRAHAM and CONNIE L. ARCHULETA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rosa v. Doe
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Commissioner, JOHN DOE, Warden, VIKI S. BLUMBERG, Medical Doctor and others
Baah v. AT&T Inc. West, et al.
as 24-2541
Plaintiff:
ALEX BAAH
Defendant:
AT&T INC. WEST, PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT AND T CORP. and others
Buqueras v. Sharecare, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03225
Plaintiff:
Victor Buqueras
Defendant:
Sharecare, Inc., Jeffrey T. Arnold and Justin Ferrero
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
