Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Jesus Rodriguez-Alvarado v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-72042
Petitioner:
JESUS ANGEL RODRIGUEZ-ALVARADO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jose Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-71666
Petitioner:
JOSE ANGEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv04646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jesus Rodriguez-Alvarado v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-74938
Petitioner:
JESUS ANGEL RODRIGUEZ-ALVARADO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Rodriguez-Puente v. Mukasey
as 08-60935
Petitioner:
JOSE ANGEL RODRIGUEZ-PUENTE, also known as Jose Angel Rodriguez
Respondent:
MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Troy Moore, et al
as 08-3409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GOVT OF THE VI
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGEL RODRIGUEZ and TROY MOORE
Defendant:
FELIX CRUZ
USA v. Rodriguez
as 07-51066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, JR.
United States v. Rodriguez-Ramirez
as 07-2172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANGEL RODRIGUEZ-RAMIREZ
Abarca, et. al. vs. Merck & Co., et.al.
as 1:2007cv00388
Defendant:
County of Merced, Ranchwood Properties, Ranchwood Homes Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia Gonzales, Kerman Eddings, Donna Simmons and others
Special Master:
Judge John K. Trotter and Judge Edward A. Panelli
3Rd Party Defendant:
State of California Department of Water Resources
Petitioner:
Curtis Scott
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Rodriguez v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00022
Plaintiff:
Raul Angel Rodriguez, Raul Angel Rodriguez and Raul Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
United Parcel Services, Inc., United Parcel Services, Inc., United Parcel Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
