Cases 71 - 80 of 104
US v. John L. Brower
as 13-6255
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN L. BROWER
Zazzali v. Alexander Partners LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00828
Plaintiff:
James R. Zazzali
Defendant:
Alexander Partners LLC, Alternative Wholesaling Group LLC, Arque Orion Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Brower et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:12-cv-00911
Plaintiff:
William Brower and Michelle Brower
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Takeda Global Research & Developement Center, Inc. and others
Brower v. Check Plus Systems
as 2:2012cv14095
Plaintiff:
Trisha Brower
Defendant:
Check Plus Systems
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2011cv05024
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION , COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO , NEW JERSEY FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, and others
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , CHRIS CHRISTIE , ANDREW SIDAMON-ERISTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. John Brower
as 11-6674
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN L. BROWER
Katz, et al v. Gerardi, et al
as 10-1407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK P. KATZ, STEVEN A. STENDER and INFINITY CLARK STREET OPERATING, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNEST A. GERARDI, JR., RUTH ANN M. GILLIS, NED S. HOLMES and others
Southern California Regional Rail Authority et al v. Leticia Magdaleno et al
as 2:2010cv06365
Claimant:
AGL, Barbara Aaronson, Diane Adair and others
Defendant:
Joel Aaronson, Karen Abed, Magdaleno Aida and others
Plaintiff:
Connex Railroad LLC and Southern California Regional Rail Authority
Ometimes Widerkehr:
Helen Widerkehr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
