Cases 71 - 80 of 1,531
USA, et al v. Lawrence WarfieldIn re: USA, et al v. Lawrence Warfield
as 23-15827
Debtor:
In the Matter of: ALBERT G. FREEMAN, Jr. and DEANNA L. FREEMAN
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee:
LAWRENCE J. WARFIELD, Chapter 7 Trustee
IN RE: NAMESILO, LLC
as 1:2023mc00054
In Re:
NAMESILO, LLC
Interested Party:
CENGAGE LEARNING INC., ELSEVIER INC. and BEDFORD, FREEMAN & WORTH PUBLISHING GROUP, LLC doing business as MACMILLAN LEARNING doing business as MCGRAW-HILL GLOBAL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC doing business as PEARSON EDUCATION, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BOBB v. Freeman et al
as 9:2023mc80387
Plaintiff:
Christina Bobb
Defendant:
Ruby Freeman
Respondent:
Wandrea ArShaye Moss
The Freeman Manufacturing & Supply Company v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01247
Plaintiff:
The Freeman Manufacturing & Supply Company
Defendant:
Jonathan Smith, Hari Patel and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Burkhart v. University Interscholastic League (UIL) et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Jerry burkhart
Defendant:
University Interscholastic League (UIL), Michael motheral, Arturo Rodriguez Cavazos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Constitutional Rights
Freeman v. Stake.com et al
as 1:2022cv07002
Plaintiff:
Christopher Freeman
Defendant:
Stake.com, Primedice, Edward Craven and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
In re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-104
Petitioner:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent:
DENNIS SPEERLY, JOSEPH SIERCHIO, DARRIN DEGRAND and others
In re: Nestle Waters North America Inc
as 3:2023mc00009
Respondent:
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP
Petitioner:
Nestle Waters North America Inc.
Intervenor:
Mark J. Patane, et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
