Cases 71 - 80 of 136
United States of America v. Quiroz et al
as 2:2017mj30597
Defendant:
Javier Arturo Quiroz and Michael Scarborough
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Scarborough
as 6:2017mc06012
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Mark G. Scarborough
Allstate Insurance Company v. A & F Medical P.C.
as 17-2391
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
A & F Medical P.C., Advanced Chiropractic of New York P.C., Alignment Chiropractic Care P.C. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Svetlana Pinkusovich, Medical Doctor and Alexander Pinkusovich, Medical Doctor
Thompson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as MOE/4:17-cv-01654
Plaintiff:
Karen Thompson , Jamie Allen , Shay Amburn and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Sletteland v. Dunn et al
as 3:2017cv00520
Plaintiff:
James P. Sletteland
Defendant:
John Douglas Dunn, Jr., James Clinton Dunn, William Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
Schultze Agency Services, LLC et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv02363
Defendant:
Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia), Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, Christopher Donnelly, Richard Reid and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Unknown:
Helen Cho Eckert, Gary L. Halling, James Landon McGinnis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Vanessa Garcia v. Scarborough Research, et al
as 2:2017cv00537
Defendant:
Does and Scarborough Research
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Garcia
In re: Artis Scarborough
as 16-13113
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS SCARBOROUGH
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
USA v. Daniel Ray Scarborough
as 16-5032
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANNY R. SCARBOROUGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
