Cases 71 - 80 of 181
Allison et al v. McCabe Trotter & Beverly PC
as 2:2017cv01727
Plaintiff:
Mills K Allison and Caitlin M Barca
Defendant:
McCabe Trotter & Beverly PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. McCabe Trotter & Beverly PC
as 2:2017cv01368
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Davis
Defendant:
McCabe Trotter & Beverly PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Corrao et al v. McCabe Trotter & Beverly PC
as 2:2017cv01371
Plaintiff:
Bree E Corrao and John Stafford Brinson, III
Defendant:
McCabe Trotter & Beverly PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Eisen v. Venulum Ltd.
as 17-1208
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bernard M. Eisen, DDS
Defendant - Appellant:
Venulum Ltd., Mark Trotter, Individually, Giles Cadman, Individually and others
Aubrey v. McCabe Trotter & Beverly PC
as 2:2017cv00656
Plaintiff:
Candis Leann Aubrey
Defendant:
McCabe Trotter & Beverly PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Park et al v. McCabe Trotter & Beverly PC
as 2:2017cv00657
Plaintiff:
Adam M Park and Tracy L Park
Defendant:
McCabe Trotter & Beverly PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Lambus (Fuller)
as 17-676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Stanley Fuller, AKA Wardy, AKA Webo
Defendant:
Kamel Lambus, AKA Kamel Angevine, AKA K, AKA Kamel Angenevine, Shavona Trappier, AKA Bobby, Shakeem Powell, AKA Sha and others
Joseph Trotter v. Linda Whittlesey
as 2:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trotter
Defendant:
Linda Whittlesey
United States of America v. Lambus
as 16-4296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Kamel Lambus, AKA Kamel Angevine, AKA K, AKA Kamel Angenevine and Stanley Fuller, AKA Wardy, AKA Webo
Defendant:
Shavona Trappier, AKA Bobby, Shakeem Powell, AKA Sha, Tyran Trotter, AKA Ty, AKA Terry, AKA Terror and others
In re: Vantanez Trotter
as 16-1957
Movant:
In re: VANTANEZ TROTTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
