Cases 71 - 80 of 106
Whyte et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-19751
Plaintiff:
Susan R. Whyte and Robert F. Whyte
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Citizens Against Casino Gambli v. Hogen
as 13-2339
Plaintiff:
Assemblyman Sam Hoyt
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County, Joel Rose and Robert Heffern, as Co-Chairpersons, Rev.D.Min.G. Stanford Bratton, Network of Religious Communities and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Philip N. Hogen, In his Official Capacity as Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, The National Indian Gaming Commission, United States Department of the Interior and others
Kendrick Whyte v. U.S. Attorney General
as 13-10746
Petitioner:
WHYTE KENDRICK
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
New Falls Corporation v. John Erdos et al
as 2:2012cv10916
Defendant:
John Erdos and Jamson Whyte Ltd
Plaintiff:
New Falls Corporation
New Falls Corporation v. Erdos et al
as 1:2012mc00154
Plaintiff:
New Falls Corporation
Defendant:
John Erdos and Jamson Whyte Ltd.
Whyte v. Holder, Jr.
as 12-2487
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MCKAY WHYTE, a/k/a Anthony White, a/k/a Jack Mack
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
United States of America v. Jone
as 12-4009
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Praddy, AKA Birdman and Torell Whyte, AKA Terror
Defendant - Appellant:
Kiond Jones, AKA Kion, AKA Kiond Hing
New Falls Corporation v. John Erdos et al
as 2:2012mc00385
Defendant:
John Erdos and Jamson Whyte Ltd
Plaintiff:
New Falls Corporation
EVANS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-02682
Plaintiff:
BYRON EVANS , ALVA EVANS , MIKE BARTRUM and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
