Cases 81 - 90 of 1,236
BANKS et al v. US BANK TRUST ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
IRA R. BANKS and VERNA BANKS
Defendant:
US BANK TRUST ASSOCIATION, BEATRICE GARRETT, BEST CARE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Person v. Best Auto Deal & Drive et al
as 0:2023cv60241
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Person
Defendant:
Best Auto Deal & Drive and AMG Recovery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
F & B Associates, Inc. v. McKnight et al
as 3:2023cv00222
Defendant:
Shane McKnight, Mixxi and Top Hat Provisions, LLC.
Plaintiff:
F & B Associates, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Best Beverage Catering
Material Witne:
Chris Gallagher
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gogu v. Coastal Transport Moving and Storage LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Swethu Gogu
Defendant:
Coastal Transport Moving and Storage LLC and Best for You Moving LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Best Western International, Inc. v. Armaos Property Holdings, LLC
as 3:2023mc00003
Plaintiff:
Best Western International, Inc.
Defendant:
Armaos Property Holdings, LLC
C.T. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00834
Plaintiff:
C. T.
Defendant:
Red Roof Inns, Inc., Wyndham Hotels and Resorts Inc., Best Western International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
USA v. Shawn Best, Sr.
as 22-30199
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAWN VINCENT BEST, Sr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
