Cases 81 - 90 of 474
RELIABLE PHARMACY et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06291
Defendant:
JAMES "JIM" GRAUSO, SANDOZ, INC., Mitchell Blashinsky and others
Plaintiff:
CHET JOHNSON DRUG, INC., RELIABLE PHARMACY, INC., RUSSELL'S MR. DISCOUNT DRUGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Charles Allen v. A. Booth, et al
as 20-56309
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. BOOTH, Correctional Officer and W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
Wojcik v. Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03491
Defendant:
Ben W. Perks, Daniel J. Booth, Kapila K. Anand and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wojcik
Lance Williams v. O. Navarro, et al
as 20-56210
Defendant / Appellee:
HALL, Correctional Counselor 1, O. NAVARRO, (Control Booth) Correction Officer, A. SOTO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS, AKA Lance Williams
Meadows on Memorial Owners v. US
as 21-1214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAWAL KAREAH, XINDI BENAVENTE, KIMBERLY BOOTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Lance Williams v. O. Navarro, et al
as 20-56163
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
O. NAVARRO, Correctional (Control Booth) Officer, R. HERRERA, Correctional Officer, RJ DEGG, Lieutenant of C-Yard and others
BOOTH v. FOREIGN STATES ALL OVER THE WORLD et al
as 1:2020cv03247
Defendant:
MISSOURI, TANZANIA, KENYA and others
Plaintiff:
KADEEM TASHAUN MYKENG BOOTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manetirony Clervrain v. Quincy L Booth
as 2:2020cv10046
Defendant:
Quincy L Booth
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02944
Defendant:
QUINCY L. BOOTH, WANDA PATTEN and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
Jannease Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
