Cases 81 - 90 of 103
HILL v. POMPEO
as 1:2018cv02518
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HILL
Defendant:
Secretary MIKE POMPEO and MIKE POMPEO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Mohammed v. Nielsen et al
as 1:2018cv07193
Defendant:
Thomas Cioppa, Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, Mike Pompeo and others
Plaintiff:
Abdulfattah Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Velarde et al v. Pompeo et al
as 1:2018cv07125
Plaintiff:
Agustin Velarde and Maria Guadalupe Aguilar Mendoza
Defendant:
John Tavenner and Mike Pompeo
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Ypina v. Pompeo et al
as 4:2018cv03046
Plaintiff:
Ascension Ypina
Defendant:
Mike Pompeo and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Jimenez v. Pompeo et al
as 4:2018cv02774
Defendant:
Mike Pompeo and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Christian Ivan Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Pars Equality Center et al v. Pompeo et al
as 2:2018cv01122
Plaintiff:
AFSHIN RAGHEBI, OneAmerica, MALAYEEN AHMED and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Kevin K. McAleenan, Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Estate of Konarik Bokhanian et al v. Jeff Sessions et al
as 2:2018cv05117
Defendant:
Donna Campagnolo, L. Francis Cissna, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Konarik Bokhanian and Aida Torossian
Valeriy Karakenyan et al v. Jeff Sessions et al
as 2:2018cv05115
Defendant:
Donna P Campagnolo, L. Francis Cissna, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Valeriy Karakenyan and Valeriy Karakenyan Revocable Trust
Karen Eghian v. Jefferson Sessions et al
as 2:2018cv05122
Respondent:
Donna Campagnolo, Francis L. Cissna, DOES and others
Petitioner:
Karen Eghian
Sesay et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2018cv01397
Defendant:
United States of America, Jefferson Sessions, Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Sesay and Mabinty Sesay
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
