Cases 81 - 90 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schofield v. US Bank, NA et al
as 1:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Billie R Schofield
Defendant:
US Bank, NA , USAA Federal Savings Bank , Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
White v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2011mc00022
Plaintiff:
Jeff White
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, (f/n/u) Alexander, Madubueze Novozo and others
Zigrossi v. Western Region Health Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
Cary L. Zigrossi
Defendant:
Western Region Health Corporation, Willcare, Inc., Willcare Home Health Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
SCHOFIELD V DVA
as 11-7049
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Preston L. Schofield
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SCHOFIELD V DVA
as 10-7008
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
Preston L. Schofield, Preston L. Schofield, Preston L. Schofield and others
In re: Hickey
as 09-2247
Petitioner:
In re: MARY ANN HICKEY
:
MARTY KILEY, RUTH E. RICE, MICHELLE SCHOFIELD and others
Respondent:
BRAD LITTLE, KEITH EDISON, WILLIAM GEORGE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
