Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Bey v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Bennie Thompson, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Harris v. Anthony, et al
as 3:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Dr. Dwalia S. South, Dr. Thad Waites, Wheeler Timothy Timbs, III and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow et al v. Phillips
as 3:2020cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lyman E. Johnson, Jr., Linda P. Byrd, Sherron G. Sandifer and others
Defendant:
Logan Burch Phillips, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Eckert et al v. Alexander
as 1:2020cv00019
Plaintiff:
William H. Eckert and Anne Y. Eckert
Defendant:
Austin Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Alltel Corporation v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00740
Defendant:
Aaron Banks, Kenneth I. Stokes, Ashby Foote and others
Plaintiff:
Alltel Corporation
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. et al v. Barlow et al
as 3:2019cv00394
Defendant:
Debra A. Hodge, Ralph H. Barlow, Laura A. McDavid and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Morgan Keegan & Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Britt v. Merit Health Central et al
as 3:2019cv00090
Defendant:
Merit Health Central, American Medical Response (AMR), John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald H. Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Mississippi Bar v. Anderson
as 3:2017ad00012
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
John H. Anderson
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Raul v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Raul
Defendant:
Gregory H. Mitchell, Ted E. Parker, J. Douglas Seidenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lefoldt v. Rentfro et al
as 5:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
H. Kenneth Lefoldt, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald Rentfro, Charles Mock, William Heburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
