Cases 1 - 10 of 992
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07867
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Valdovinos-Torres, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4913
Petitioner:
MARIA ESTHELA GARCIA-CISNEROS, ARELY VALDOVINOS-GARCIA, KARINA VALDOVINOS-GARCIA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vivas Sanchez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4584
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
KEVIN NATANAEL CHAVEZ VIVAS, BLANCA LUZ VIVAS SANCHEZ and ALFONSO DAVID CHAVEZ VIVAS
Marquez Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-1929
Petitioner:
KENIA YAKELIN MARQUEZ RODRIGUEZ, DAVID ALFONSO ANTUNEZ ALVARENGA and ANDERSON DAVID ANTUNEZ MARQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lover-El v. Kroger Food 4 Less
as 24-4007
Plaintiff:
EL'ESTRO LOVER-EL, Alfonso Soliz-Perez-El Jr. and Alfonso Solis-Perez-El Jr.
Defendant:
KROGER FOOD 4 LESS
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Chihuahua Mexican Restaurant LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01618
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Chihuahua Mexican Restaurant LLC doing business as Chihuahua Mexican Restaurant and Alfonso Avila doing business as Chihuahua Mexican Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Alfonso Zarate-VargasIn re: Alfonso Zarate-Vargas
as 24-50514
Petitioner:
In re: Alfonso Zarate-Vargas
Respondent:
United States of America
Amelio v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 24-1619
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO AMELIO, CARMINE AMELIO and CLEMENTE AMELIO
Defendant:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC., FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, MCABE, WESIBURG & CONWAY, P.C. and others
Cuper Development LLC et al v. City of Cudahy et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Cuper Development LLC, Go Cudahy LLC, Davina LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Cudahy, Alfonso Noyola, Elizabeth Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
