Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Recinos v. Pierce County Risk Management, et al.
as 23-3821
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIFFANY DION RECINOS
Defendant / Appellee:
PIERCE COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT, Mitigate Waste Damage Washington State, PIERCE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, Pierce County, PIERCE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Dfinity Foundation v. New York Times Company
as 23-7838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DFINITY FOUNDATION, Switzerland-based not-for-profit organization
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, a New York corporation, ANDREW ROSS SORKIN, an individual, EPHRAT LIVNI, an individual and others
Defendant:
CHARLIE SMITH, an individual
United States v. Keelyn Stokes
as 23-3262
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Keelyn Morelle Stokes
BROWN v. CATALENT, INC. ET AL.
as 3:2023cv15722
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BROWN
Defendant:
CATALENT, INC. ET AL., JOHN CHIMINSKI, ALESSANDRO MASELLI and others
Giron Rodas v. Garland
as 23-752
Petitioner:
MILTON MOREL GIRON RODAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv18308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
US v. Morell-Oneill
as 21-1772
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL JAVIER MORELL-ONEILL, a/k/a Joel Cortorreal, a/k/a Angel Javier Oneil
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
