Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Remsen v. American Home Shield Corporation
as 2:2023cv02573
Plaintiff:
Kimberley Remsen
Defendant:
American Home Shield Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Boudreau v. American Home Shield Corporation
as 3:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Ryan Boudreau
Defendant:
American Home Shield Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Matthew McClure v. American Home Shield Corporation
as 2:2022cv02163
Plaintiff:
Matthew McClure
Defendant:
American Home Shield Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv07747
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. ELC ELECTRIC, INC. et al
as 1:2013mc00130
Garnishee:
AMERICAN HOME SHIELD, FIFTH THIRD BANK, PNC BANK and others
Respondent:
ASSET MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, INC., EDWARD L. CALVERT, ELC ELECTRIC, INC. and others
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Kohl v. American Home Shield Corp.
as 3:2012cv02827
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Kohl
Defendant:
American Home Shield Corp. and Zip Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. ELC ELECTRIC, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00851
Garnishee:
AMERICAN HOME SHIELD, FIFTH THIRD BANK, THE NATIONAL BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Respondent:
ASSET MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, INC., EDWARD L. CALVERT, ELC ELECTRIC, INC. and others
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Richard Kohl v. American Home Shield Corp.
as 11-80309
Plaintiff - Respondent:
RICHARD J. KOHL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
AMERICAN HOME SHIELD CORP.
Kohl v. American Home Shield Corp.
as 3:2011cv00700
Plaintiff:
Richard J Kohl
Defendant:
American Home Shield Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
