Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc et al
as 2:2024cv09234
Defendant:
Kalavathi Baskaran, Vatsala Sampathkumar, Nadadur Sampathkumar and others
Plaintiff:
Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar and Annamalai Annamalai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Annamalai Annamalai
as 23-10953
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
In re: Annamalai Annamalai
as 22-10092
Petitioner:
In re: ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Annamalai Annamalai
as 21-13002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI, a.k.a. Dr. Commander Selvam, a.k.a. Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
SIVANADIYAN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv01950
Petitioner:
PARVATHI SIVANADIYAN
Interested Party:
VISHAL KALYANI
Respondent:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Annamalai Annamalai v. Warden
as 21-10161
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
USA v. Annamalai Annamalai
as 20-10543
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI, a.k.a. Dr. Commander Selvam, a.k.a. Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Annamalai et al v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 1:2019mi00164
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant(s)
Plaintiff:
Parvathi Sivanadiyan and Annamalai Annamalai
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
USA v. Parvathi Sivanadiyan, et al
as 19-13726
Not Yet Classified:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Defendant / Appellant:
PARVATHI SIVANADIYAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Annamalai Annamalai, et al
as 19-13676
Defendant / Appellant:
PARVATHI SIVANADIYAN and ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI, a.k.a. Dr. Commander Selvam, a.k.a. Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
