Cases 1 - 10 of 49
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024mc00280
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
In re: Matthew Phillips
as 23-13163
Petitioner:
In re: MATTHEW SHERMAN PHILLIPS
Respondent:
GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN and others
Donald Whatley v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 23-12863
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD DWAYNE WHATLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Mohammad SharifiIn re: Mohammad Sharifi
as 23-10618
Petitioner:
In re: MOHAMMAD SHARIFI
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR MADISON COUNTY
Commissioner, Alabama Department of CorrectionsIn re: Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 22-12700
Petitioner:
In re: COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER BARBOUR
Bosarge et al v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Patrick Charest, Clifford Ellis, Robert George and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury, Janet L. Yellen, Kay E. Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Brandon Ryles v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-13934
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRANDON JAMAL RYLES
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EASTERLING CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
