Cases 1 - 10 of 123
USA v. Aldana-Perez
as 24-50469
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Julio Cesar Aldana-Perez
Alyse Sanchez v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 24-1487
Plaintiff:
ALYSE SANCHEZ, ELMER ONAN SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ, AMIRA ABBAS ABDALLA and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, PATRICK J. LECHLEITNER, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and MATTHEW ELLISTON, Acting Director, Maryland Field Office of ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations
In Re Jason Scott Harper
as 5:2024cv01027
Not Yet Classified:
Jason Scott Harper
Plaintiff:
Sequoyah Deserthawk Kidwell
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Rob Bonta, David Holbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maldonado v. Hy Cite Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Maldonado
Defendant:
Hy Cite Enterprises, LLC, Wolf Union and Carfred Steven Aldana Lucena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Peyton v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno
as 23-4067
Petitioner:
RAYMOND E. PEYTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Not Classified By Court:
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, (Fresno), KATHLEEN ALLISON, ROB BONTA and others
Cardenas-Aldana v. Garland
as 23-1245
Petitioner:
JOSE HUMBERTO CARDENAS-ALDANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aldana Vasquez v. Garland
as 22-1313
Petitioner:
MILTON ALDANA VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v. Josue Aldana
as 23-4157
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSUE ALDANA
In re: Francisco Aldana
as 22-80090
Respondent:
In re: FRANCISCO JAVIER ALDANA, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: November 8, 2005
Brandon Viana-Aldana v. Merrick Garland
as 22-2069
Petitioner:
BRANDON VIANA-ALDANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
