Cases 1 - 10 of 35
TORRES-BARRERA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01295
Petitioner:
SAUL ANTONIO TORRES-BARRERA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 300 Vaccine Injury Act
The Estate of Jose Antonio Torres-Martino, et al v. Fountain Christian Bilingual School Carolina Inc., et al
as 22-1209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF JOSE ANTONIO TORRES-MARTINO, represented by Raul Cintron-Rodriguez and RAUL CINTRON-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
FOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN BILINGUAL SCHOOL CAROLINA INC., FREDDY ABDUL-SANTIAGO, FOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN BILINGUAL SCHOOL INC. and others
USA v. Torres Marrufo
as 22-50189
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Antonio Torres Marrufo, also known as Jaguar, also known as Tonin, also known as Catorce, also known as 14, also known as Tono, also known as El Uno
USA v. Wilber Torres-Pineda
as 21-12832
Defendant / Appellant:
WILBER ANTONIO TORRES-PINEDA, a.k.a. Yiyo
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Antonio Torres-Simon v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70524
Petitioner:
ANTONIO TORRES-SIMON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Pedro Torres v. William Barr
as 19-73121
Petitioner:
PEDRO ANTONIO TORRES
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Jose Torres-Carcamo v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60882
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO TORRES-CARCAMO
Pedro Torres v. William Barr
as 19-72093
Petitioner:
PEDRO ANTONIO TORRES
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Marco Torres-Castelan
as 19-50388
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCO ANTONIO TORRES-CASTELAN, also known as Marco Torrez, also known as Marco Torres-Castellan, also known as Marco Torres
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Torres-Santana
as 19-1087
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO TORRES-SANTANA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
