Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Lawrence v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, Frederick A. Henderson, William F. Austen and others
Rosenfeld v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05313
Plaintiff:
Zahava Rosenfeld
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, William F. Austen, Christopher L. Ayers and others
Williams v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05235
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, Frederick A. Henderson, William F. Austen and others
Bushansky v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05167
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, William F. Austen, Christopher L. Ayers and others
Wang v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05091
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, Frederick A. Henderson, William F. Austen and others
O'Dell v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04971
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, Frederick A. Henderson, William F. Austen and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang, Stephen Bushansky, Robert Williams and others
Fuller et al v. Bloom Institute of Technology et al
as 3:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Jessica Fuller, Alexander Gonclaves, Brett McAdams and others
Defendant:
Bloom Institute of Technology, Austen Allred, Does 1 - 9 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
WALKER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00333
Petitioner:
AUSTEN WALKER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Emmanuel Williams v. Z. Austen
as 21-16755
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL DONTEZE WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER Z. AUSTEN, P.B.S.P.
Abad et al v. Bonham et al
as 2:2020cv00447
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Charlton Bonham
Plaintiff:
Austen Brown and Joseph Abad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
