Cases 1 - 10 of 562
US v. Benitez-Guivas
as 24-2040
Defendant:
EDGARDO ABISMAEL BENITEZ-GUIVAS, a/k/a Buda, a/k/a Buda De Las Margaritas
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
United States v. Ramirez
as 24-5123
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MISAEL BENITEZ RAMIREZ, AKA Misael Benitez-Ramirez, AKA Edwin Nelson Sorto, AKA Misael Ramirez, AKA Misael Benitez, AKA Edwin Gomez-Ramirez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08688
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ramos-Benitez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-5583
Petitioner:
BERANICE GRISELDA RAMOS-BENITEZ and DAYRON NOE SANCHEZ-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Brahim Abreu-Benitez
as 24-2593
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRAHIM ABREU-BENITEZ, a/k/a Lawrence Reyes Cartagena
Protrade Logistics Corp et al v. Asuccini, LLC
as 8:2024mc00023
Interested Party:
Americana Worldwide Inc. and Mark Kengott
Petitioner:
Protrade Logistics Corp and Jose Benitez
Defendant:
Asuccini, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Alvarado-Gomes, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3795
Petitioner:
LILIANA ARELY ALVARADO-GOMES, HENRY FABRICIO ALVARADO-GOMES, CRISELY ARELY BENITEZ-ALVARADO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Safehouse, et al
as 24-2027
Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SAFEHOUSE, A Pennsylvania Nonprofit Corporation and JOSE BENITEZ, as President and Treasurer of Safehouse
Hernandez Benitez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3160
Petitioner:
CARMEN YESSENIA HERNANDEZ BENITEZ and DILAN JAFET RODRIGUEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos-Benitez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3123
Petitioner:
BERANICE GRISELDA RAMOS-BENITEZ and DAYRON NOE SANCHEZ-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
