Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CUNNINGHAM v. WALLACE & GRAHAM, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
Bill Graham, Joel R Rhine, P Mark Doby and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee and Kenneth L. McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dingle v. Baggett et al
as 5:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Brenda Englis, Patricia Ellen Watson Dingle, Joseph A. Bledsoe, III and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dingle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ZOU et al v. MARKET AMERICA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00954
Defendant:
DOLLY KUO, MARKET AMERICA WORLDWIDE INC., LIU LUCY HONG and others
Plaintiff:
OLLIE LAN, JINHUA ZOU, CHUANJIE YANG and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hayes v. Butler
as 5:2017cv00309
Plaintiff:
Katrina Hayes
Defendant:
Bill Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Blue Ridge Podiatry Associates, P.A. v. Annexmed Billing Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00078
Defendant:
Annexmed Billing Services, Inc. and John Does
Plaintiff:
Blue Ridge Podiatry Associates, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Inman v. Duvera Billing Services, LLC
as 7:2015cv00215
Plaintiff:
Eric Inman
Defendant:
Duvera Billing Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bollmeier et al v. Hummel et al
as 3:2015mc00035
Plaintiff:
Eddie Bollmeier , Bill Tracey and Simon Parrott
Defendant:
Gary Hummel, Stephen Bradford, Rob Streble and others
TAY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00802
Plaintiff:
TAY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, MARISSA PISARICK, RANDOLPH NAOMI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
