Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Live Nation Entertainment Inc v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Live Nation Entertainment Inc
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company afent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Columbus Emergency Group, LLC et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
as 7:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
Columbus Emergency Group, LLC, Sylva Emergency Group, LLC, Jones Lake Emergency Group, PC and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
STARK v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION et al
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRA STARK
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION and CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant:
Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant:
Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mishanta Reyes
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
