Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sean Buford, et al v. CAM2 International L.L.C., et al
as 23-8010
Respondent:
Sean Buford, Arkansas Eastern, 1:19-cv-00082, Terry Zornes, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257, Adam Sevy, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257 and others
Not Classified By Court:
William James, Missouri Western, 3:19-cv-05089, Duane Fosdick, California Eastern, 2:19-cv-01850, Ellen Allicks, Illinois Central, 2:20-cv-02177 and others
Petitioner:
CAM2 International L.L.C. and Smitty's Supply, Inc.
Chamber of Commerce v. NLRB
as 12-1757
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SOUTH CAROLINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Defendant - Appellant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, MARK PEARCE, in his official capacity as Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board, BRIAN HAYES, in his official capacity as member of the National Labor Relations Board and others
Defendant:
CRAIG BECKER, in his official capacity as member of the National Labor Relations Board
National Association of Manuf, et al v. NLRB, et al
as 12-5138
Plaintiff - Appellee:
National Association of Manufacturers, Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
National Labor Relations Board, Mark Pearce, in his official capacity as member of the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, in his official capacity as member of the National Labor Relations Board and others
Natl Assoc. of Manufacturers, et al v. NLRB, et al
as 12-5068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
National Association of Manufacturers, Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
National Labor Relations Board, Mark Pearce, in his official capacity as member of the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, in his official capacity as member of the National Labor Relations Board and others
Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 2:2011cv02516
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States and South Carolina Chamber of Commerce
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board , Mark Pearce , Craig Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION, INC. et al v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al
as 1:2011cv01683
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION, INC. , NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDANT BUSINESS , SOUTHEAST SEALING, INC. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD , MARK PEARCE , CRAIG BECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, et al v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al
as 1:2011cv01629
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS , COALITION FOR A DEMOCRATIC WORKPLACE , NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD , MARK PEARCE , CRAIG BECKER and others
Amicu:
JOHN KLINE , UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES , DAN BURTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
The Chickasaw Nation v. NLRB, et al
as 11-6209
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE CHICKASAW NATION, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, and in their official capacities as members of the Board, WILMA B. LIEBMAN, Chairman, CRAIG BECKER and others
New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Forde et al
as 1:2011cv05474
Plaintiff:
New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Michael Forde, John Greaney, Joseph Olivieri and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Eames v. Liebman
as 1:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
Brady Eames
Defendant:
Wilma B. Liebman , Mark G. Pearce , Craig Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
