Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Soto v. Coronado-Newton et al
as 3:2021cv01620
Plaintiff:
Andy Soto
Defendant:
Pauline Coronado-Newton, Biju Abraham, Rahim Mawani and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1605
Cachet Financial Services v. C&J Associates, Inc.
as 5:2016cv06862
Defendant:
C&J Associates, Inc., C&J Associates, Inc. a Nevada corporation doing business as Pinnacle Workforce Solutions, Rivetna Architects, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cachet Financial Services
Special Master:
Honorable Richard S. Flier
Intervenor Defendant:
Century National Insurance Company
Petitioner:
Gavin de Becker & Associates
Claimant:
IBM CREDIT, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
RCMC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
John C. Hom & Associates, Inc. v. CIR
as 13-72684
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN C. HOM & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv02923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chen v. J. C. Christensen & Associates, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv60893
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth P. Chen
Defendant:
J. C. Christensen & Associates, Inc. and LVNV Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv01912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Yarbrough v. J. C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.
as 0:2007cv60836
Plaintiff:
Donald A. Yarbrough and Donald A. Yarbrough
Defendant:
J. C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
