Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Roy v. Russell et al
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Mark A. Russell, Michael Lohscheller, Stephen J. Girsky and others
Thompson v. McDonough
as 22-1088
Claimant:
WILEY C. THOMPSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, H. WICKHAM, Deputy Dir. of NDOC, COLLMAN, S C/O Mailroom Super and others
Defendant:
BRIAN SANDEVAL, ADAM LAXSULT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Dana McCalla v. Angela Thompson, et al
as 21-1975
Defendant / Appellee:
CINDY BARTER, SHARI KLENKE, JENNIFER DALY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANA E. MCCALLA
William Thompson v. Kelley Hinely, et al
as 20-3438
Defendant / Appellee:
Nurse Kelley Hinely, Nurse Veronica Dockery, Dustin Sanders and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William C. Thompson
Defendant:
William Storey
Thompson v. Care Credit et al
as 3:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Care Credit, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, Hearing Life and others
Plaintiff:
Nick C. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 19-16794
Defendant / Appellee:
HICK-MOSES, W. MILLER, Sgt., ADAM LAXSULT and others
Defendant:
JOHNS, Dr.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02503
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. $393,677.98 Siezed From Home Federal Savings Bank, Account No. 327000869
as 0:2018mc00034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$393,677.98 Siezed From Home Federal Savings Bank, Account No. 327000869
Claimant:
Roderick C. Thompson
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
