Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Rene A. Polanco v. Lehman Brothers et al
as 8:2023cv02075
Defendant:
Andrew Cecere, Richard S. Fuld, Jr., Lehman Brothers and others
Plaintiff:
Rene A. Polanco
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Morales-Mejia v. Garland
as 23-2899
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS MORALES-MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pagan-Porrata, et al v. Municipio de Guaynabo, et al
as 19-2178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL CUMBAS-APONTE, CYNTHIA PAGAN-PRORRATA, ROBERTO SANTOS-TORRES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VICTOR FRANCO, in his official capacity as Police Commissioner of Guaynabo Municipal Police Department and GUAYNABO, PR
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Massachusetts Development Finance Agency et al
as 1:2018cv11279
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Devens Enterprise Commission, Lauren A. Liss and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Juan Morales Carrera v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71167
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS MORALES CARRERA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Carlos Morales-Hernandez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71602
Petitioner:
CARLOS MORALES-HERNANDEZ, AKA Carlos Hernandez Morales
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
US v. Morales-Ayala
as 16-2410
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS MORALES-AYALA, a/k/a Charlie
PPV Entertainment, LLC. v. Yoyo's Sport Bar Corp. et al
as 3:2015cv02993
Plaintiff:
PPV Entertainment, LLC.
Defendant:
Yoyo's Sport Bar Corp., Carlos Morales-Jordan and Myrma Jordan-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlos Morales v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-3810
Petitioner:
CARLOS MORALES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
