Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Christopher Holmes v. Elephant Insurance Company
as 23-1782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, TRINITY BIAS, JAIME CARDENAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ELEPHANT INSURANCE COMPANY, ELEPHANT INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC and PLATINUM GENERAL AGENCY, INC., d/b/a Apparent Insurance
Holmes v. Elephant Insurance Company et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Christopher Holmes, Trinity Bias, Jaime Cardenas and others
Defendant:
Elephant Insurance Company, Elephant Insurance Services, LLC, Platinum General Agency, Inc. doing business as Apparent Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
USA v. Holmes
as 21-50297
Defendant / Appellant:
Justin Christopher Holmes
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Rene Edwards v. The Hillman Group Company for, et al
as 20-2758
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, THE HILLMAN GROUP COMPANY FOR SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON COMBINATION PADLOCKS, MARCUS O. HICKS, Esq., (Commissioner) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENE D. EDWARDS
Rene Edwards v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 19-3857
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAMS, Senior Corrections Officer (FNU), SCO I. SAMPSON, JOYNER, Senior Corrections Officer (FNU) and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, Warden/Administrator, individually, and in their official capacities and GARY M. LANIGAN, Warden/Administrator, individually, and in their official capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENE D. EDWARDS
Joel Holmes v. George Bowden
as 19-35468
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOEL CHRISTOPHER HOLMES
Respondent / Appellee:
GEORGE N. BOWDEN, Judge
Joel Holmes v. Sarah Roberts, et al
as 17-73119
Petitioner:
JOEL CHRISTOPHER HOLMES
Respondent:
SARAH ROBERTS and ROB MCKENNA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
