Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Arizona Broadcasters Association et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2022cv01431
Plaintiff:
Arizona Broadcasters Association, American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, Arizona Newspapers Association and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Rachel Mitchell and Paul Penzone
Amicus Curiae:
Central Arizona NLG, Southern Arizona NLG, Mass Liberation AZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arizona, State of et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2021cv00186
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Tracy Renaud and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Brnovich, Arizona, State of and Montana, State of
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union of Montana Foundation Incorporated, American Civil Liberties Union, Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
In Re: Subpoena In Civil Case Denise Perrault v. Irfan Fazil et al
as 2:2020mc00004
Petitioner:
United States of America
In Re:
Subpoena In Civil Case Denise Perrault v. Irfan Fazil et al
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 2:2018cv04821
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2017cv01083
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties et al
as 2:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona and American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego and Imperial Counties
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, United States Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Arizona Civil Liberties Union et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security
as 4:2014cv02052
Plaintiff:
Arizona Civil Liberties Union , Derek E Bambauer and Jane Yakowitz Bambauer
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Stark County, et al v. Ruth, et al
as 3:2012mc08000
Plaintiff:
Stark, County of , United States of America , Ohio Civil Rights Commission and others
Defendant:
John L Ruth , Mary Ruth , Yorkshire Apartments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. In the Matter of: Letter Rogatory from Argentina by the Civil Court and Commercial Matters No 14 of Buenos Aires, Argentina for Assistance in the Civil Matter of Garcia Avant, Ruth Patricia C/Noya, Jo
as 4:2010mc00026
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
In the Matter of: Letter Rogatory from Argentina by the Civil Court and Commercial Matters No 14 of Buenos Aires, Argentina for Assistance in the Civil Matter of Garcia Avant, Ruth Patricia C/Noya, Jo
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Valle del Sol, et al, v. Whiting, et al.
as 2:2010cv01061
Plaintiff:
C.M., Jose Angel Vargas, Coalicion De Derechos Humanos and others
Defendant:
Michael B Whiting, Edward G Rheinheimer, David W Rozema and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Janice K Brewer, Phoenix Law Enforcement Association and others
Petitioner:
First Amendment Coalition of Arizona, Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
Amicus Curiae:
Legal Momentum, National Council of La Raza, American Immigration Lawyers Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
