Cases 1 - 10 of 410
US v. Melvin Saldana
as 24-4252
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MELVIN CANALES SALDANA, a/k/a Carlos Vigil Garay, a/k/a Carlos Bladimir, a/k/a Demente
Canales v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Juan Canales
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
United States of America v. Morales-Reyes
as 24-35
Defendant:
CARLOS DANIEL ECHEVARRIA-GONGO, AMAURY RUIZ MARTINEZ, JANSY PEREZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS MORALES-REYES and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McGuire PV Holding L.P. et al v. Sonwil Distribution Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01277
Counter Defendant:
McGuire PV Holding L.P., Campus Square LLC, RP Oak Hill Building Company, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Sonwil Distribution Center, Inc., Proline Concrete of WNY, Inc. and Site Specialties, LLC
Counter Claimant:
315 Ship Canal Parkway, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Amaya-Canales v. Garland
as 23-7741
Petitioner:
YAMILETH DEL ROSARIO AMAYA-CANALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cole v. Nassau County Sherrif's Department Division of Correction
as 23-7627
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA WILLIAMS, DUANE GREENE, KYLE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CREGORY COLE
Defendant / Appellee:
NASSAU COUNTY SHERRIF'S DEPARTMENT DIVISION OF CORRECTION and NASSAU COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Castro Canales v. Garland
as 23-6989
Petitioner:
JOSE SANTIAGO CASTRO CANALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
In Re: Graham Chase Robinson
as 23-1157
Petitioner:
Graham Chase Robinson
Respondent:
Robert De Niro and Canal Productions, Inc.
Sorto-Canales v. Garland
as 23-60417
Petitioner:
Jenny Soeth Sorto-Canales and Dayanna Soeth Ceren-Sorto
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
